Still Not Too Late To Claim Your 2014 Tax-Settlement Relief Package
===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== =====
The IRS Has Granted Relief For: Carlos.Arriba@hombres.locos.mx
Under The IRS Fresh-Start Initiative Relief Program
===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== =====
You were identified as a candidate for this program.
This settlement package can alleviate financial stress
Relief Package No. 2501136827274314696:
http://spars.hatpinabye.com/vtp-sd181829887553a.nb-418160194w?wu.21191401cmc
If no response is given within 24 horus, we cannot gurantee this
package
________________________________________________
MSNBC | CNN | Fox_News |
http://spars.hatpinabye.com/vtp-sd181829887553a.nb-418160194w?wu.32382804cmc
________________________________________________
If this relief package is of no interest to you, then let us know at:
http://spars.hatpinabye.com/vtp-sd181829887553a.nb-418160194w?wu.32382806cmc
Or submit a letter to - 15500.SW_Jay|St.-Beaverton|Oregon| 97006-6018
You may also go to: http://spars.hatpinabye.com/181829887553/2178200=418160194
---845/north/front/street/west/grand/island/ne/68801-4740
For the second year in a row, practitioners will experience a less-than-flying
start to tax season. As this article went to press, tax season was expected to
begin between Jan. 28 and Feb. 4, a result of the 16-day partial government
shutdown in October, although the IRS was hoping to minimize the delay. CPA
return preparers, in turn, might encounter snags as they grapple with a number
of new or changed provisions. As in past years, the JofA offers this summary
intended to highlight new or notable provisions and, as a handy reference, a
?Filing Season Quick Guide? with many of the most frequently consulted tax
tables, thresholds, credit amounts, and other important benchmarks.
This time around, practitioners can at least feel relieved that the list of
temporary provisions that expired at the end of 2012 is relatively short,
unlike a year ago, when Congress kept them and taxpayers in suspense until New
Year?s Day with passage of the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012
(ATRA), P.L. 112-240. Only then could they learn the fate of a number
of important individual and dozens of business-related provisions for the year
just ended. However, many of ATRA?s extensions were only through the end of
2013 (see the sidebar below, ?Looking Ahead,? for details).
New top ordinary income tax rate. A top rate of 39.6% applies to taxable income
over $400,000 for single filers, $425,000 for head-of-household filers, and
$450,000 for married taxpayers filing jointly ($225,000 for each married
spouse filing separately). The last time the income tax brackets had a
39.6% marginal rate on individuals was in 2000.
Itemized deductions limitation and personal exemptions phaseout. The itemized
deductions limitation and personal exemptions phaseout (PEP) have
been reinstated. If a taxpayer?s adjusted gross income (AGI) exceeds
an applicable amount based on his or her filing status, the taxpayer?s allowed
itemized deductions will be limited. The applicable amounts for 2013 are
$250,000 for single taxpayers, $275,000 for heads of household, $300,000 for
married taxpayers filing jointly, and $150,000 for married taxpayers filing
separately. The itemized deductions limitation, also known as the Pease
limitation, is a 3%/80% formula, under which itemized deductions are reduced by
the lesser of 3% of the excess of AGI over the applicable amount above or 80%
of the amount of the itemized deductions otherwise allowable for the tax year.
(The limitation had been eliminated for 2010 through 2012.)
Under PEP, a taxpayer?s personal exemptions are reduced by 2% for every $2,500
(or fractional amount) (or $1,250 for married taxpayers filing
separately) by which AGI exceeds the applicable amounts above (Sec.
151(d)(3), as amended by ATRA). Like the Pease
limitation, the PEP didn?t apply for tax years 2010 through 2012.
Alternative minimum tax. Beginning in 2013, ATRA permanently indexed for
inflation the alternative minimum tax (AMT) exemption amount and the
thresholds for the 28% AMT rate for individuals and made the AMT offset for
nonrefundable credits permanent. The increase for inflation of the AMT
exemption amounts for individuals had often been late-enacted relief in years
past. For 2013, the exemption amounts are $80,800 for married taxpayers filing
jointly, $40,400 for married taxpayers filing separately, and $51,900 for
single filers. The inflation-adjusted threshold for the 28% AMT rate is
$179,500 for married taxpayers filing jointly and unmarried individuals
(other than surviving spouses) and $89,750 for married taxpayers
filing separately.
physical Role limitation emotional Energyfatigue Mental health Social
functioning Pain General health FACTG socialfamily P group of patients for whom
standard therapy is inadequate or has failed Unrealistic expectations and false
hope in patients who consider phase I studies may need to be addressed in the
informedconsent process The treatment response rates for patients in phase I
trials have consistently been reported in the literature as less than The
likelihood of lifethreatening toxicity is similarly low with toxic deaths
reported to be The reason for the discrepancy between patient and health care
provider expectations is unclear Mackillop et al and Siminoff et al showed that
patients often have inaccurate perceptions of their cancers with differing
expectations of treatment outcome compared with their physicians Daugherty et
al reported discrepancies between physician and patient assessment of goals and
toxicities from phase I trials We confirmed these differences !
between patient and physician expectations showing that patient estimation of
the probability of benefit from experimental treatment was much higher than the
estimation of their treating physician We also showed that differing
expectations of toxicity are present because patients overestimated the
toxicities of both standard and experimental therapy compared with their
physicians Furthermore we showed that research nurses who play an integral and
often overlooked role in the informedconsent process have treatment
expectations that are similar to those of physicians rather than patients
Clearly the disparities we observed between patients and providers raise
concern for the effectiveness of the informedconsent process for this
vulnerable population We observed a positive correlation between patient
expectations of benefit from experimental and standard therapy Those who were
most optimistic regarding the potential benefits of experimental therapy tended
to feel that standard!
therapy would also be of benefit There was also an inverse correlation
between a patients expectation of benefit from experimental therapy and the
possibility of anadverse reaction from the therapy Those who felt that
experimental therapy had the greatest chance of benefiting them tended to feel
that they were less likely to experience adverse reaction from the experimental
therapy compared with patients who were less optimistic about the benefits of
experimental therapy This again points to an optimistic mindset r
|
9305. Tax comfort
